Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 14(6): 1570-1578, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2160997

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Real-world data for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), specifically pertaining to clinical management, metabolic control, treatment patterns, quality of life (QoL) and dietary patterns, are limited. Understanding these gaps using real-world, routine care data will improve our understanding of the challenges and consequences faced by patients with CKD, and will facilitate the long-term goal of improving their management and prognosis. METHODS: DISCOVER CKD follows an enriched hybrid study design, with both retrospective and prospective patient cohorts, integrating primary and secondary data from patients with CKD from China, Italy, Japan, Sweden, the UK and the USA. Data will be prospectively captured over a 3-year period from >1000 patients with CKD who will be followed up for at least 1 year via electronic case report form entry during routine clinical visits and also via a mobile/tablet-based application, enabling the capture of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In-depth interviews will be conducted in a subset of ∼100 patients. Separately, secondary data will be retrospectively captured from >2 000 000 patients with CKD, extracted from existing datasets and registries. RESULTS: The DISCOVER CKD program captures and will report on patient demographics, biomarker and laboratory measurements, medical histories, clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, medications, dietary patterns, physical activity and PROs (including QoL and qualitative interviews). CONCLUSIONS: The DISCOVER CKD program will provide contemporary real-world insight to inform clinical practice and improve our understanding of the epidemiology and clinical and economic burden of CKD, as well as determinants of clinical outcomes and PROs from a range of geographical regions in a real-world CKD setting.

2.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 26(10): 974-981, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1877851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictive factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is crucial for risk stratification and intervention. Kidney dysfunction contributes to the severity of various infectious diseases. However, the association between on-admission kidney dysfunction and the clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients is unclear. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients, diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction. We retrospectively analyzed 500 COVID-19 patients (mean age: 51 ± 19 years) admitted to eight hospitals in Japan. Kidney dysfunction was defined as a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or proteinuria (≥ 1 + dipstick proteinuria) on admission. The primary composite outcome included in-hospital death, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilation (invasive and noninvasive methods), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: Overall, 171 (34.2%) patients presented with on-admission kidney dysfunction, and the primary composite outcome was observed in 60 (12.0%) patients. Patients with kidney dysfunction showed higher rates of in-hospital death (12.3 vs. 1.2%), mechanical ventilation (13.5 vs. 4.0%), and ICU admission (18.1 vs. 5.2%) than those without it. Categorical and multivariate regression analyses revealed that kidney dysfunction was substantially associated with the primary composite outcome. Thus, on-admission kidney dysfunction was common in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, it correlated significantly and positively with COVID-19 severity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: On-admission kidney dysfunction was associated with disease severity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Thus, on-admission kidney dysfunction has the potential to stratify risks in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Proteinuria , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 26(9): 909-916, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1844393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical reports indicate a correlation between new-onset and relapse of nephrotic syndrome (NS) following coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with glomerular diseases. However, there are no reports of a nationwide survey on NS following COVID-19 vaccination in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of council members of the Japanese Society of Nephrology (581 members, 382 facilities) to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and new-onset and relapse of NS. RESULTS: Following COVID-19 vaccination, 27 patients (male: 15, 55.6%) with new-onset (n = 6) and relapse (n = 21) of NS were reported. Of them, 12 (44.4%) patients were diagnosed with minimal change disease at the occurrence of NS. Five patients developed a slight increase in serum creatinine levels; however, none progressed to severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our findings clarify the clinical features of new-onset and relapse of NS following COVID-19 vaccination. Although there was no obvious progression to severe renal dysfunction, clinicians and pathologists should be aware that NS is a potential adverse effect of the vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Nephrotic Syndrome , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Nephrotic Syndrome/epidemiology , Nephrotic Syndrome/etiology , Recurrence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/adverse effects
5.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 26(4): 316-322, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1513987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical reports indicate a correlation between gross hematuria after the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with glomerulonephritis, especially immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Furthermore, healthcare workers in Japan were initially vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine from February 17, 2021, and some of them experienced gross hematuria after receiving the vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of the councilor members of the Japanese Society of Nephrology (581 members, 382 facilities) to elucidate the relationship between gross hematuria and COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In the first survey, 27 cases (female: 22, 81.5%) of gross hematuria were reported after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. Of them, 19 (70.4%) patients were already diagnosed with IgAN at the occurrence of gross hematuria. Proteinuria appeared in eight of the 14 (57.1%) cases with no proteinuria before vaccination and hematuria in five of the seven (71.4%) cases with no hematuria before vaccination. The second survey revealed that a renal biopsy was performed after vaccination in four cases, all of whom were diagnosed with IgAN. Only one case showed a slightly increased serum creatinine level, and no patients progressed to severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: This study clarified the clinical features of gross hematuria after a COVID-19 vaccination. Because there was no obvious progression to severe renal dysfunction, safety of the COVID-19 vaccination is warranted at least in the protocol of inoculation twice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hematuria/epidemiology , Hematuria/etiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Adult , Biopsy , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Kidney/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/epidemiology , Proteinuria/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256255, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1352712

ABSTRACT

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250581.].

7.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 25(9): 996-1002, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1245658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are no reports of a large-scale survey on the infection prevention measures against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in nephrology facilities. This study investigated the facility-level nephrology practices adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated challenges. Additionally, the treatment patterns and outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with COVID-19 were reviewed. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 704 educational facilities that were certified by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) from October 20, 2020 to November 16, 2020. The questionnaire reviewed the facility characteristics, infection prevention measures taken during routine nephrology practice, impact of COVID-19 on nephrology practice, experiences in managing CKD patients with COVID-19, and nosocomial transmission in the nephrology unit. RESULTS: Of the 347 facilities that responded, 95.1% checked outpatients' body temperatures and COVID-19 symptoms at their visits. To reduce face-to-face contact, 80% and 70% of the facilities lengthened the intervals between outpatient visits and introduced online/telephonic consultations, respectively. As a result, more than half of the hospitals experienced a decrease in the numbers of outpatients and inpatients (64% and 50%, respectively). During the study period, 347 facilities managed 479 CKD patients with COVID-19. Oxygen administration and mechanical ventilation were performed for 47.8% and 16.5% of the patients, respectively, with a 9.2% total mortality rate. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated that JSN-certified educational nephrology facilities adopted multiple measures to manage the COVID-19 pandemic; however, they faced several challenges. Sharing these experiences could standardize these approaches and prepare us better for the future.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Infection Control , Nephrology/education , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, University , Humans , Japan , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Ren Replace Ther ; 7(1): 27, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1247607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global pandemic affecting a variety of medical treatments, including hemodialysis. This study aims to investigate the implementation of infection control measures, to examine the shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) and disinfectants, and to quantify the number of nosocomial COVID-19 transmissions in hemodialysis facilities in Japan during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey between 20 October and 16 November 2020 (i.e., between the "second wave" and "third wave" in Japan) in the 4198 dialysis facilities of the Japanese Association of Dialysis Physicians and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. A total of 2227 facilities (53.0%) responded. The questionnaire consisted of (i) characteristics of facilities, (ii) infection prevention measures in routine dialysis practices, (iii) shortage of PPE, (iv) feasibility of various isolation measures, and (v) nosocomial transmission. RESULTS: Half of the responding facilities were hospitals with multiple departments, and the other half were clinics specialized in dialysis. Several infection prevention measures such as health checks of staff and patients, donning of masks before and after hemodialysis, and disinfection of frequently contacted areas were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant improvement in the implementation rate of these measures during the pandemic, compared to before it, which reached over 90%. More than half of the facilities reported a shortage of disposable masks (67.2%) and hand sanitizer alcohol (56.7%). Isolation of COVID-19 patients in private rooms was possible only in 52.7% of the facilities. The majority of facilities (73.3%) could not accept COVID-19 dialysis patients due to lack of space and manpower. Nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 occurred in 4.0% of the facilities. Of those infected, 51.9% were staff. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed that most hemodialysis facilities in Japan had improved implementation of infection control measures and had shortage of PPEs and disinfectants, though some facilities did not implement infection prevention measures adequately, mainly due to the limited space of the facility. It may be recommended that each facility immediately establishes isolation measures to prepare for the pandemic of COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41100-021-00350-y.

9.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250581, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1199979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: Data on how lifestyle changes due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have influenced the clinical features of kidney disease patients remain scarce. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical variables in patients with stage G1-G4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) with complete or incomplete remission of proteinuria, who were managed in a nephrology outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Tokyo. The clinical variables during the COVID-19 pandemic (term 1, June-July 2020) were compared to those one year before the pandemic (term 0, June-July 2019). The urinary protein excretion (UPE) was used as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: This study included 325 patients with stage G1-G4 CKD (mean age 58.5 years old, 37.5% female, 80.6% on renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors [RAASis], 12.0% on maintenance dose immunosuppression therapy) evaluated at term 0. The UPE at terms 0 and 1 was 247 (92-624) and 203 (84-508) mg/day [median (25th-75th percentile)], respectively; the value in term 1 was 18% lower than that in term 0 (p<0.001), with no marked difference in body weight, blood pressure, protein intake or urinary salt excretion. In multivariable analyses, incomplete remission of proteinuria in term 0 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70, p = <0.001), RAASi use (OR = 2.09, p = 0.02) and decreased urinary salt excretion in term 1 vs. term 0 (OR = 1.94, p = 0.002) were identified as independent variables associated with reduced UPE in term 1 vs. term 0. No significant interactions between the variables were observed. CONCLUSION: In kidney disease patients receiving standard medical care from nephrologists, the UPE after the emergency declaration in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic was lower than before the declaration. The UPE reduction may be associated with reduced dietary salt intake during the pandemic in patients treated with RAASi for insufficient control of proteinuria. Our results support the current proposal to continue therapeutic approaches to these patients, which involve RAASi therapy along with optimizing dietary habits, even while dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Proteinuria/pathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/pathology , Adult , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Proteinuria/complications , Remission Induction , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL